Customer Rating: 
Summary: Still a "did he do it" or "didn't he do it" case
Comment: I am old enuf to have lived thru this, as a child, so have an interest beyond just a story. This is a very good video of the story..and like those before and after...it remains unsolved altho the law "got their man"?
I like the actors in this HBO production. Well done and it is a "heavy" piece of material hence I don't agree with others that it was overacted.
No account solves this crime but this version is entertaining from that standpoint and informative also. I heartly recommend this video.
Customer Rating:
Summary: surprised and curious
Comment: I know little about the Lindbergh kidnapping, and was shocked at the content of this video. I thought it was difficult in several respects: over-acted by the "heavies" (except, of course, Michael Moriarty), blatantly one-sided, and simplistic. However, I was drawn in and very interested in the simplistic, blatant script and found myself alternately puzzled, angry, and enraged. At my age, I admit to surprise in feeling such strong emotion at a display of justice/injustice in America, but this film hooked me and makes me feel naive again. I will read more about this case; therefore, using the yardstick of intellectual curiosity, I give it a "5". It also entertained me at 4 a.m., so despite the over-acting I'll give it an overall "4".
Customer Rating:
Summary: Before there was OJ there was the Lindbergh Case.
Comment: Before there was OJ there was the Lindbergh Case. Charles Lindbergh jr., was
kidnapped from his home in March 1932 and despite the payment of $50,000
ransom he was never seen alive again. Some time later his body was found less
than a mile from his home leading to speculation that he never survived the
actual kidnapping. For over a year the case went unsolved until a German
immigrant was found to be spending the ransom money.When arrested the immigrant, Bruno Richard Hauptmann, was initially evasive.
He finally stuck to a story that he had acquired the money from a fellow
immigrant who left him a box for safekeeping while on a voyage back to
Germany. When that man died in Europe owing Hauptmann money, he opened the
box and discovered the cash. Figuring that this would serve as repayment
Hauptmann hid the money not telling his wife or other friends owed money by
the dead man. The police found this story unlikely and coupled with
Hauptmann's initial falsehoods under questioning they became convinced that
Hauptmann had been the killer and kidnapper of the Lindbergh baby.
The case gave the nation and the world the first "Trial of the Century". A
circus like atmosphere existed outside the courtroom with food and souvenirs
for sale to the excitable crowd. The evidence presented was circumstantial
but convincing to the jury. The defense maintained that much of it was
doctored or coerced by the police; this was not convincing to the jury. The
verdict was guilty and the sentence was death.
Hauptmann was subjected to the ultimate penalty in 1936. But since that date
the datable has raged on. There are many who are remain convinced by
Hauptmann declarations of innocence and believe that he was railroaded to
protect the careers of those who could not find the real killers. The more
mainstream view holds that Hauptmann was in fact guilty of participation in
the kidnapping.
This movie is firmly on the side of Hauptmann. He is shown as an immigrant
who is always hustling for a better life for his family who is chosen as a
convenient victim for the justice establishment. His view of how he got the
money is taken as fact and his brave stance maintaining his innocence costs
him all possible lenience. Hauptmann's wife insists that 'the truth shall
set you free' and is determined to prove that her husband was innocent of the
crime.
It is hard to say that any movie with Isabella Rossellini is not the best,
however this movie does have some serious flaws. While made in the 90s the
producers seem to feel that it was necessary to have the actors act like it
was a 1930s gangster movie. Most of the 'bad guys' (The police and DA) are
just a little too into playing the tough guys and a little too uninterested
in discovering the facts of the case. It sets a jarring note that continues
throughout the whole movie.
It is possible that there were shady dealings and a rush to judgement. But
some facts are indisputable. Hauptmann was found possessing $14,000 of
ransom money. He did lie to the Police and the Lindbergh baby was dead.
Some facts are undoubtedly lost to history forever, but this does not give
the producers the right to make them up and then package them as history.
Customer Rating:
Summary: Who dunnit? If you don�t know already, ...
Comment: Crime of the Century fails much in the same way the system of justice failed in the prosecution of for the kidnapping and murder of Charles Lindbergh's baby in the 1930s, not enough evidence.I know Mark Rydell (On Golden Pond) to be an extremely sensitive filmmaker and stage director, his motivation here, I'm sure was to present an alternative to Hauptmann's guilt, to entertain ideas that the prosecution may have erred. The evidence was only circumstantial, of the course the crime was horrible, but Hauptmann's execution may have been more a result of public outrage than guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
And he may be right, based on everything I've read, he probably is right. Unfortunately all the probabilities in the world add up to nothing on screen. After only a couple of suppositions the viewer gets so lost in the ultimate goal of the story that he loses interest. I've watched this film 3 times, and lost interest every time.
What a waste of terrific actors, including Stephen Rea, J.T. Walsh, Michael Moriarty, Vyto Ruginis, Barry Primus, and Allen Garfield.
Without closure, as long we as know as little as we do about what actually happened, maybe this story is best left to the true-crime section of the local bookstore, or Investigative Reports, Dateline, or 20/20. Told this way, in this medium it's a sad waste of time.
Customer Rating:
Summary: This movie has several life lessons for every one.
Comment: Everything about this movie is brilliant. The acting, the story and the lessons to learn. This is definitely recommended for children and adults alike who want to learn about what life has to teach us. That man is consumed by himself; that a virtuous woman is indeed had to find; and that the truth is ultimately best, even at the risk of your own life. I know Hauptmann today only because and thanks to his virtuous wife, he ultimately stood for what was true and died for it. His one sin was to have covered the truth in the first place. May God bless his soul, his wife and their family.
I recommend that this video be shown both at home and at work, to help reinforce the kind of values that society should have.
I thank the writer, producers, actors and all others involved in the production of this film - for sharing this wonderful story with us and for giving me and all others the opportunity to learn.
