|
|
Tarfumes.com - Sangean ATS-606AP AM/FM Digital Compact Shortwave World Band Receiver
|
List Price: $289.00
Our Price: $131.43
Your Save: $ 157.57 ( 55% )
Availability: Usually ships in 24 hours
Manufacturer: Sangean
|
Average Customer Rating:  
|
|
Batteries Included: 0
Batteries: 2
Battery Description: 2 AA
Binding: Electronics
Brand: Sangean
EAN: 0729288016069
Feature: Frequency range of 153 to 29,995 kHz and 87.5 to 108 MHz
Is Autographed: 0
Is Memorabilia: 0
Label: Sangean
Legal Disclaimer: Warranty does not cover misuse of product.
Manufacturer: Sangean
Model: ATS-606AP
Number Of Items: 1
Publisher: Sangean
Studio: Sangean
|
|
|
Features
|
Frequency range of 153 to 29,995 kHz and 87.5 to 108 MHz
Receives AM, FM, LW, and SW
54 memory settings, auto-tune scan function
Digital clock/timer with dual alarm
Includes ANT-60 antenna and multivoltage AC adapter
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Editorial Reviews:
|
Sangean Electronics is one of the world's oldest and largest manufacturers of multi-band, portable and pocket sized entertainment centers. Established in 1974, the name Sangean is recognized throughout the world for its innovative design, unparalleled performance and matchless quality. All Sangean products are high quality, portable and aesthetically appealing with the kind of feel and performance that has made Sangean the fastest growing radio line in the market today.PRODUCT FEATURES:Continuous tuning all bands;Ultra compact, full featured;5 tuning methods;Auto-tune system;54 memory presets;Auto memory scan;Dual time display;Large LCD digital display.
|
|
|
Spotlight customer reviews:
|
Customer Rating:
Summary: I AM ON MY THIRD ONE
Comment: After years of looking I have found the perfect traveling companion! I am currently using my third one of the same radio. U.S.A, New Zealand, Europe, S. America, or the Far East. Whenever you settle for the night; simply scan all available stations, and within one minute, and you have your contact with listening for the rest of the night. Any option you could imagine is available(I have used AM/FM 99% of the time). The batteries seem to last forever!! A little bit of a challenge to learn what buttons do what, but when you have that down it is a dream! I doubt I will ever use another radio when I travel. My best friend.
Customer Rating:
Summary: Very good radio!
Comment: I had this radio (from Radio Shack) for some 5+ years and it always was one nice, easy to use, reliable, with nice reception, nice alarm "human" system device!
I gave it to my dad and he still using it daily. The only thing is the price. It is hard to swallow an idea of $100+ for a radio. But the device itself it superb.
Customer Rating:
Summary: Great little radio
Comment: Owned one of these for about 4 years and dropped it several weeks ago. Replaced it with another one last week. Works great on all bands, SSB and synchronus detection would be a nice addition though.
Customer Rating:
Summary: Great Pocket Sw Radio from Sangean
Comment: For several years, this has been my favorite multiband pocket radio. It recently has been bumped from that position by the Kaito KA1102(see my review on the Kaito). Both receivers offer excellent AM FM and Shortwave performance, including STEREO to earphones.
The choice between the two radios hinges on features, price and desire for ease of use.
Sangean offers Long wave reception, Kaito does not.
Kaito has Single sideband mode (for Hams), Sangean does not.
Humane alarm of Sangean is less "jarring".
Sangean in MUCH easier to use/Manual is easy to understand.
Kaito is cheaper but feels more solidly built.
Sangean has rotary volume control, Kaito has up/down buttons.
"batteries included" on Kaito (NiMH rechargeable).
Both are pretty amazing for their size!!!
Customer Rating:
Summary: Wasn't What I Expected,
Comment: I got this radio November 9th, and am not pleased. The reception isn't that great, and the F.M. has too much override; where you hear the same station on adjacent frequencies. Unless it's a very strong station, you have to tune away from the nearby station to get anything. Sangean could've done better.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
