|
|
Tarfumes.com - The War - A Film By Ken Burns and Lynn Novick
|
List Price: $129.99
Our Price: $79.99
Your Save: $ 50.00 ( 38% )
Availability: Usually ships in 24 hours
Manufacturer: PBS
Directed By: Ken Burns, Lynn Novick
|
Average Customer Rating:  
|
|
Aspect Ratio: 1.78:1
Audience Rating: NR (Not Rated)
Binding: DVD
Brand: PARAMOUNT PICTURES
EAN: 0841887052122
Format: Anamorphic
Label: PBS
Manufacturer: PBS
Number Of Items: 6
Publisher: PBS
Region Code: 1
Release Date: 2007-10-02
Running Time: 900
Studio: PBS
Theatrical Release Date: 2007-10-02
|
|
|
|
|
|
Editorial Reviews:
|
The War will be a seven - episode series produced by Ken Burns and Lynn Novick that will examine the myriad ways in which the Second World War touched the lives of every family on every street in every town in America. By telling the stories of ordinary people in four quintessentially American towns Waterbury Connecticut; Mobile Alabama; Sacramento California; and the tiny farming town of Luverne Minnesota the series will portray this enormous worldwide catastrophe on an intimate human scale. The War will intertwine vivid eyewitness accounts of the harrowing realities of life on the front lines with reminiscences of Americans who never left their home towns and who tried their best to carry on with the business of daily life while their fathers and brothers and sons were overseas. The film will honor and celebrate the bravery endurance and sacrifice of the generation of Americans who lived through what will always be known simply as The War.System Requirements:TRT: 900 Mins.Format: DVD MOVIE Genre:Â DOCUMENTARIES/MISC. Rating:Â NR UPC:Â 841887052122 Manufacturer No:Â 705212
|
|
|
Spotlight customer reviews:
|
Customer Rating: 
Summary: Solid
Comment: In regards to art, greatness is not merely a difference of scale, but a difference of kind, in that the elements that constitute greatness force an almost alchemical change in the nature of the beast. The brushstroke, wordly coinage, motion of the camera, or whatever it is that constitutes the given art, becomes more than the brushstroke, wordly coinage, or motion of the camera. There seems to be an almost ineffable rise in the ability to invoke reaction from the art's percipients, and while certainly not supernatural, the great art and the great artist is a cut above, even if the mechanism of the ascendancy is not immediately evident, even to the most astute critic.
This ideal was brought home to me while watching filmmaker Ken Burns' most recent PBS documentary, The War, co-directed by Lynn Novick, for Burns, despite his ability to often stumble into a great moment, seems not to fundamentally understand the mechanics nor elements that constitute greatness. This 15 plus hour film follows in the wake of three other monumental documentaries he has crafted in the last decade and a half: the magnificent The Civil War- whose only dramatic flaw was the melodramatic schmaltz historian Shelby Foote displayed for the Confederacy, the too long Baseball, and the somnolent Jazz. In between he has crafted some interesting shorter documentaries on subjects as diverse as Mark Twain and Jack Johnson, but his bread and butter has been the marquee `big doc.'
Burns has been plagued by years of controversies, both artistically and historically. His best film, The Civil War, which pioneered the Burnsian template of talking heads, melodramatic readings of personal letters, and slow scans of still photographs, accompanied by sometimes highly poetic words (and often purple prose), and swelling crescendos of music, was a triumph of art in a journalistic form. Yet, even that artistically great film was dogged by numerous historical flaws- documented in Robert Brent Toplin's book Ken Burn's The Civil War: Historians Respond. Baseball was far too long, and too obsessed with the cult of personality, rather than the thing that made the game America's pastime: its history, season by season, and its pennant races. Jazz was a snooze that hagiographized often obscure musicians, and the whole project was a bit too weighted down with Political Correctness.
Burns does not often fall into The Greatest Generation claptrap that was so nauseating a decade ago- after all, yes, that generation defeated the Nazis and Japanese empires, but did nothing to end segregation and interned 120,000 Japanese-American citizens. By contrast, the Baby Boomers presided over the downfall of the Soviet Empire, sent man to the moon, ended the folly of Vietnam, supported Civil Rights and Women's Liberation, founded the modern Conservation movement, and survived the political hari-kiri of Watergate and Iran-Contra. By my scorecard, the Baby Boomers win by a substantial margin.
Yet, given all the potential that Burns demonstrated with his magisterial, if flawed, The Civil War, those many years ago, The War comes off as a passable, though ultimately forgettable, document- a solid 70 out of 100; but far short of the BBC's mid-1970s landmark (albeit Anglophilic) The World At War, still the touchstone documentary effort regarding World War Two. The reasons for these I have documented. So, I must return to my earlier posit, that this solid effort is not only different in scale from The Civil War, but different in kind. One may be able to pinpoint a scene here, or a dozen there, see the flaw stemming from Burns' own parting of ways with his brother Ric Burns, who was instrumental in many of Ken Burns' earlier, better works, or some other reason I have not spotted, or have forgotten in the morass of this film's heft- even though it seems far less weighty than the shorter great film. Yet, whatever that reason is, or those reasons are, to most they will remain as ineffable as the insights so many of Burns' subjects could not voice. And, after all, is not the voice the key to all good stories?
Lo!
Customer Rating:
Summary: Well done!
Comment: This is one of the best documentaries on the WWII. I love it. It's not like usual crap done by Hollyweird. It's stripped off the hollyweirdish heroics and thats why this film is great. It's real and sticks well. I can't get enough of it. Good job!
Customer Rating:
Summary: Excellent Replacement
Comment: The original product content was good, however disc #5 was defective in a couple chapters. Amazon quickly issued me return postage stickers and sent replacement box set, which has no defects. Very pleased with final outcome!
Customer Rating:
Summary: Tells A Great Story
Comment: This is a must see film by Ken Burns. Showing both the war overseas and what effect it had on families & cities back in the U.S at the time, makes this an outstanding film. 5 Stars +
And Thank You to the men and women that fought this war both away and here at home.
Customer Rating:
Summary: Fairly good for PBS
Comment: This is a fair series and a good introduction to WWII for a high school class. For any real or part time historian it's fair. This reviewer has come to expect major bias in any PBS series and the fairly even treatment the USA receives from Ken Burns is a nice break from the relentless media "this nation is evil" coverage.
Burns does a good job of showing the USA's build up to the war. He does leave out the fact that the US Navy was the equal of the British Navy. But Burns does show the fact that the US Army was ill prepaired for WWII. Also, Burns shows the first major battle of the US Army at Kasserine Pass in early 1943. The Germans wrecked the better part of a corps of the US Army and knocked it back over 50 miles. While the Soviets had beat Germany at Moscow and Stalingrad in 1941 and 1942 the US Army didn't even get in its first fight with Germany until 1943. That should be a shock to the viewers.
Now, the series is given as sort of a martix to viewers. Every disk covers a set period of time: 1941, 1942, 1943, and ect. Then there are chapters in every time frame. A viewer will see the home front, racial problems, the internment of Japanese Americans, the dreadful prison conditions Japan put both our citizens and soldiers to endure, the fighting by the army, and the actions by the US Navy. What drove this reviewer nuts was the conditions in the Japanese and German death camps was put side by side next to the conditions of the Japanese American camps. Yes, it's too bad that the Japanese Americans were jailed. However, to show it as equal as the German or Japanese death camps is bias on a plate.
Burns ignores lots of action by the US Navy. He ignores Java Sea, Savo Island, Coral Sea, and Bismarck Sea. He spends lots of time on Midway. But if two Japanese carriers had not had their aircrews destroyed at Coral Sea then the US would have been looking at six carriers at Midway, not just four. Bismarck Sea wrecks the last offensive action of the Japanese Navy.
Burns also kind of ignores the U-boat war. So, between giving a light treatment of Naval actions in the Pacific and basically ignoring the U-boat war it costs a star.
Burns spends a lot of time with racial and riots in the USA. While the Soviet Union was wrecking the Nazi Wehrmacht at Moscow, Stalingrad, and Kursk there were race riots in Georgia and Detroit. Burns shows the war through four cities in four seperate states. Honestly, it may not be a good representation. Alabama is in the deep South but Mobile Bay is not representative of the area. California's City of Sacramento may not be a typical California city. You get an impression of a weird sort of view that isn't quite like all of America.
Burns does not properly show that this war was America's production war. America made over 10 battleships (400,000 tons), 200 destroyers (400,000 tons), thousands of heavy bombers, tens of thousands of fighters, over 35,000 Sherman tanks, over 1 million heavy machine guns, and the rest of the materials needed for war.
Now, in the much better video series on WWII is "World at War", produced by the BBC in the early 1970s. It does a much better job of showing the allies in the fight and - weirdly - does a better job of showing the USA getting ready, fighting, and producing for the war.
Another annoying thing is the reading of letters by various actors, such as the over rated Tom Hanks. It detracts from the message and the time would have been better showing the weapons systems or the internal problems of the US Army.
Burns does spend a lot of time on the subject of the Strategic bomber offensive against Germany. Now, it is something worth noting that the United States Army Air Force lost more airmen in 1943 fighting against Germany than the US Army lost in soldiers at the debacle at Tunisia Pass. The video series "World at War" tells the view by doing interviews with the Germans that Nazi Germany had to expend an Army of soldiers and airmen to protect the Reich against air attacks. Burns does not get that point across to his view; the allies in 1943 had a defacto second front against the Germans which is exactly what Stalin wanted.
But the part where Ken Burns makes up for all of the sins was in the fall of Japan. I expected bias to be served in large amounts. Instead it was quite good. The B-29 bombing of Japan was shown as it was intended; it's a way of beating Japan. The atomic bombs are just a weapon system that induce Japan to surrender. Burns shows what the people of that era in the USA showed of the atomic bombing of Japan; they loved it. It ended the war. It stopped the killing of Americans.
So, I would endorse this video for a quick and fast way of learning about a war that determines America's destiny in the last sixty years of the 20th Century. The viewer is given an over view of race relations, the fighting, the results, and conditions at home.
It's not bad and earns an honest three stars.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
